![]() ![]() I’m not the biggest fan of this, as I believe defense is an equally important (if not more important) part of the game. This is an option for a team loaded with attackers, and have an “offense is the best form of defense” mentality. In addition, given this formation lends itself to a possession based approach, both strikers must be willing to go deep to support the midfield with keeping possession, and make smart and well-timed runs to take advantage of any openings created by out-of-position opponents. Think partnerships like Yorke-Cole at Manchester United. Similar to the 3-3-2, you want your strikers to combine well in a 2-4-2. With just two center backs in front of the goalie, the wide-men may have to track back in defensive situations to deal with wide threats, in order to avoid stretching the center backs. While the intention is to dominate possession, the two wide midfielders also have to pay heed to the defensive line when the opponents have the ball. The midfielders try to drag the opposition out of position, and create a chance for the two forwards up-front. One-touch play is common in this formation in the middle of the park. This formation requires midfielders who are comfortable and patient with the ball. Overloading the midfield with four players either side of two attackers/defenders, allow teams to retain possession in the middle of the park, and try to cut attacking moves higher up the pitch. ![]() The 2-4-2 is an ideal formation for teams that want to dominate the possession. The combination between mobile wingers and strikers can be deadly as they can move in and out of each other’s spaces making it tough for defenders to mark them.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |